Cone Red AI AI-First Transformation Practice
A Field Handbook · v1 · 2026

Building an
AI-first company.

Not by adding AI — by re-architecting around it. The architects' handbook for companies going AI-first — built by the team that ships AI-first foundations across Fortune 500.

150+ projects
Enterprise AI delivered
€50M+
Documented savings
21 banks
One multi-tenant deploy · 99.6% acc
5 countries
Active practice footprint
Why this practice exists

In 2025, 42% of organizations scrapped most of their AI initiatives — up from 17% in 2024. The fastest-deteriorating spend category in the enterprise.

Even MIT's most-cited number, its critics admit, captures what every CFO is feeling: 95% of enterprise GenAI pilots produce no measurable P&L impact.

We work on the 5% that compound.  Sources: S&P Global Voice of the Enterprise (n=1,006), Oct 2025; MIT Project NANDA, Jul 2025.

Read it. Share it.

Two formats, same arc. Send the long-read to a CEO; bring the deck to an offsite.

The AI-First Readiness Score.

Six questions. Two minutes. One number that tells you exactly where your company sits on the AI-first curve — and what it costs to stay there.

Answer honestly. Each "yes" is one of the six anti-patterns we see kill AI rollouts. The lower the score, the closer you are to AI-first. Your score updates live as you answer.

  1. Your teams use AI mostly as a search engine — typing queries, reading answers — rather than working with it like a colleague.
  2. AI in your company writes outputs — emails, summaries, code — but rarely reasons through decisions before you do.
  3. There's no schema or pre-commit validation on AI output. Quality depends on whoever is paying attention that day.
  4. One person — or a tiny team — is the only one who really understands how the AI stack works. Bus factor of one.
  5. You're investing in elaborate AI infrastructure before the team uses the basics every day.
  6. Critical decisions, lessons, and tribal knowledge live in Slack/Telegram — not in a journal anyone can search six months from now.
/ 6 Answer all six to see your tier

Each question maps to one of the six anti-patterns we've seen kill AI rollouts across 50+ Fortune 500 engagements. Score yourself — then decide if it's worth a 30-minute conversation.

Why every company should adopt this.

The compounding gap between "added AI" and "AI-first" is now measured in quarters — and widening monthly.

Speed compounds, not stalls. A 90-min meeting becomes 5–10 cited tickets in 20 minutes, not 3 hours. Bottleneck moves from typing to thinking.
Knowledge stays when people leave. The vault is the institutional memory. When the hero leaves, intelligence stays. Bus factor > 1, by design.
You stop paying the SaaS tax. One git repo. No vendor lock-in. SaaS apps become render layers — not sources of truth.
Every project gets smarter. Cross-project memory means month 3's project starts where month 1's ended. Skip a week of discovery, every time.
AI actually pays back. Most "AI rollouts" are tools bolted onto SaaS. AI-first re-architects so AI is the substrate — that's where the compounding wins live.
Cheap to install. Expensive to skip. Five commands, ~90 minutes, one co-work session. Companies that delay this don't catch up — they fall further behind, monthly.

What we hear from inside Fortune 500 right now.

Anonymized, but real. A Fortune 500 international food-and-beverage conglomerate. Their employees reached out to us directly, bypassing their corporate AI rollout. Five verbatim complaints:

  1. "Our monthly KPI is the number of prompts we run. Not outcomes."
  2. "We're mandated to use Copilot — even though we're non-tech and it's the wrong tool for what we do."
  3. "We don't know what other AI tools exist."
  4. "We don't know how to use them."
  5. "We don't know which problems they should solve."

Three weeks ago, The Information reported Meta did the same thing publicly: a "Claudeonomics" leaderboard ranking 85,000+ employees by token spend, taken down two days later. Linear's COO on the record: "Don't mistake a high burn rate for a high success rate."

This is what an "AI rollout" looks like inside most Fortune 500s in 2026. Counting prompts. Mandating one tool. No skill layer. No workflow rethink. The 95% pilot-failure rate isn't a tech problem. It's this.

McKinsey, BCG, and Deloitte cannot name this dysfunction — their buyer is the executive whose vanity KPI is the bug. We can.

Selected outcomes.

A sample from production deployments across the practice. Sanitized for NDA compliance — sector, scope, measurable result.

Financial Services · Banking
Multi-agent document processing across 21 banks
  • $250M+ in documents processed
  • 99.6% accuracy on compliance verification
  • 90% reduction in document handling time
  • Live in 21 institutions
Healthcare · Pharma Retail
Graph-based recommendation engine, 120+ pharmacy locations
  • 280% ROI in 4.2 months
  • +19% revenue from AI-driven recommendations
  • 2.3M safe recommendations · zero critical incidents
  • Scaled to 120+ locations
Industrial · Mining
Voice-driven AI documentation for €133M field operation
  • 90% reduction in documentation time
  • 9,700% projected ROI on operational efficiency
  • Hands-free dictation in hazardous environments
  • Integrated with existing ERP
FinTech · Logistics Compliance
RAG-based conflict detection & document generation
  • Cost per transaction: $120 → $3 (97% cut)
  • Processing time: 2–3 hrs → <4 min
  • Scales to 2,000+ docs/month
  • Compliance error rate near-zero
Manufacturing · QC
Computer-vision defect detection across 50+ production lines
  • 92% defect detection accuracy
  • $800K documented annual savings
  • 10,000+ units inspected daily
  • Manual workload −60%
Enterprise · Multilingual RAG
Internal knowledge Q&A for 3,500+ employees
  • Live for 3,500+ users in 5+ languages
  • Internal support requests −60%
  • Sub-second query latency
  • Replaced manual document search

The compounding gap.

What an AI-first operating model looks like in audited disclosure and CEO-signed memos. Not architecture diagrams — operational rules.

Klarna · FY2025 disclosure (SEC Form 6-K, Feb 19, 2026)

Revenue per employee $1.24M, +3.6× since 2022. Headcount down 49%. AI assistant doing the work of 853 full-time agents; 81% of customer-service chats resolved by AI; CSAT on-par with human agents. Audited disclosure, not a marketing slide.

Tobi Lütke · Shopify CEO memo (Apr 7, 2025)

"Reflexive AI usage is now a baseline expectation at Shopify… Before asking for more headcount and resources, teams must demonstrate why they cannot get what they want done using AI."

That's the operational rule. It cannot be debunked. Most companies don't have one.

The pattern across both: AI-first isn't a tooling claim. It's a measurable operating model — revenue per employee, headcount discipline, written rules at the CEO level.

Selected clients.

Named engagements (current and prior portfolio) — the experience underwriting every conversation. References available under MNDA.

Current practice engagements
City of Tampere
Public Sector · B2G
Finland's third-largest city. Smart-city AI engagement.
n5bank
FinTech · Banking Infrastructure
Fintech licensing & M&A platform.
VESCO
Industrial · Mining
€133M industrial mining operation. Voice-driven AI documentation.
anri-pharm
Healthcare · Pharmacy Retail
Ukrainian pharmacy chain · 100+ locations.
Practice Lead's prior enterprise portfolio
HSBC · Bank of America · Hyundai · Raiffeisen Bank International · ArcelorMittal · Metinvest

12+ years personally leading AI systems for Fortune 500 banks, automotive, and steel/mining majors — through prior roles at Silent Eight (AML), Raiffeisen Bank International (Vienna AI Operations), and Intech Group (acquired Dima's AI/IoT consultancy in 2020). The track record underwriting every engagement.

Engagement details, named references, and outcome calls available under MNDA.

Practice areas.

14 verticals, 260+ documented use cases, deep domain knowledge per sector. Engagements spanning Fortune 500 banks to municipal governments.

Financial ServicesDeep · 19 cases
Public Sector / B2GDeep · 21 cases
EnterpriseDeep · 20 cases
E-commerceStrong · 14 cases
Web3 / CryptoStrong · 14 cases
Industrial / ManufacturingStrong · 11 cases
Marketing / AdtechActive · 8 cases
Healthcare / MedTechActive · 7+ cases

Also serving: EdTech · Real Estate · Defense · Gambling · B2B Data · Software.

Engagement shape & cost.

Indicative ranges before scoping. Every engagement starts with a fit call. If we're not the right fit, we'll tell you on the first call and point you somewhere honest.

Diagnostic
€2.5–5K · 1–2 weeks
Architecture review + readiness map. Walk-away deliverable; no commitment to phase 2.
Pilot
€25–60K · 4–8 weeks
Production build of one critical scenario. Shadow-run, eval-gated, your team trained alongside.
Production rollout
€100–300K+ · 3–6 months
Full integration, multi-team enablement, the architectural patterns shipping inside the org.
Operate & evolve
€6–15K / mo · ongoing
Eval tuning, agent updates, memory-layer ops, quarterly architecture reviews.

Fixed-scope pricing per phase, not time-and-materials. References available under MNDA. Higher-touch advisory and AI-First community tier in design — ask on the first call.

Practice deep-dives.

Cross-vertical specialty offerings. The architectural patterns we ship inside engagements, packaged for buyers ready to go a layer deeper than the AI-First handbook.

Specialty · for CTOs & AI leads

Memory Layer · Memory, engineered →

The cognitive substrate for AI agents that remember — across sessions, across languages, across years. Five layers, three-tier formation, hybrid retrieval, locked eval methodology. Not chat history with retrieval. Architecture.

Specialty · for product & ops leads

AI-PM Pipeline · Tickets, drafted →

We refused to hire a $5K/mo PM. We built this instead. Three agents — transcript-extraction → product-manager → ticket-file generator — turn a 90-min meeting into 5–10 fully-cited tickets in 20 minutes. Runs three projects in parallel; onboards to any new domain instantly. Pre-commit hook is the safety net. Not a writing assistant. Production.

Practice leadership.

The handbook is authored by the practice lead based on hundreds of real engagements. Cone Red is co-founded and run by two operators with complementary disciplines.

Dima Levin

Practice Lead · Co-founder · CAIO

Co-founder & Chief AI Officer at Cone Red — the Barcelona-based AI automation lab behind the named engagements above. 150+ enterprise AI projects · €50M+ documented savings · 1 successful exit (Intech Group, 2020).

Also co-founder of GetDeal.AI ($60M+ M&A pipeline) and BankStore.ai ($1.5M raised · 70+ banks · 180+ payment providers). PhD candidate, Smart Cities & AI.

Alex Korobeynikov

CEO · Co-founder · Web3 · Blockchain · AI

4× founder. 8 years in Web3 with $560M+ AUM in prior portfolios. Leads Cone Red's go-to-market and the practice's Web3 / Blockchain / AI convergence work — where on-chain meets on-vault.

Practice team

Senior practitioners delivering production AI across the engagement portfolio.

Martin Lead GenAI Eng · Agentic Workflows · RAG
Illia Lead AI Eng · Computer Vision · MLOps
Michael Senior ML Eng · MLOps · Agentic AI
Nijat Data Scientist · Predictive Modeling · CV
Takhir ML Engineer · RAG · NLP · Vector Search
Alim Full-Stack Eng · FastAPI · React · FinTech
Stanislau Software Eng · Full-Stack · LLM Integration

Every engineer on the practice has shipped production AI systems — not just prototypes. Extended network of vetted specialists scales the practice for larger engagements.

Need this on Monday, not next quarter? First slot is usually within 48 hours. Book a 15-min intro · email dima@cone.red · cone.red